🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to pass a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid starting point," stated the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures mandating parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various individuals to follow Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this global conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers indicate that governments around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.